In John Locke’s “Of Identity and Diversity,” he discusses the
necessary requirements and the restrictions of having an identity, or of being
a Person-- a being who is more than “substance” and more than a “man.” A Person
is a conscious being. Locke stresses that one being cannot have two beginnings
of existence; neither can two diverse beings share one beginning. In the
episode of Black Mirror titled, “Be
Right Back” we observe a failed attempt of one being trying to have a second
beginning of existence. The episode begins with Martha and Ash, a young, happy,
and in love couple moving into Ash’s childhood home to start a new chapter of
their lives together. Not far into the plot, Ash dies in a car accident. At
first, devastated Martha strongly opposes to her friend’s recommendation to try
software that learns and mimics a deceased person’s personality via that
person’s online interactions. Once Martha does give the software a shot, in
desperation to share the news of her pregnancy with Ash, she is immediately
obsessed with it. And who wouldn’t be excited about the opportunity to speak
with a deceased loved one again? (I asked this in class and surprisingly it
seemed that the majority of people wouldn’t want to, I’m not sure if I believe
that though…) When Martha takes the technology to the extreme, by buying a
synthetic body (Locke’s “man”), at first it appears to be a successful
experiment. But the expectations and its limitations did not take long to
build. If Martha had been able to acknowledge and accept that this New Ash can
never and will never be the Old Ash, then I think it might have been able to
work out. But Martha expected and desired so badly for this being to be Ash
reincarnated, which is impossible for two of the same identities to exist
separately or for one being to have two beginnings of existence. In the scene
where New Ash and Martha are standing on the cliff’s edge and they have a
confusing argument about how the Old Ash would react in comparison to New Ash,
Martha has a realization and asks, “You aren’t you, are you?” This statement
expresses Martha’s associating both Ashs to be the same Person, and her
frustration with being unable to accept that they are not.
This topic also brought to mind the idea of cloning. I’ve
seen an interview of a wealthy older couple that had a beloved dog they never
wanted to lose. So before this dog died, they paid for the preparations to
have it cloned once it did. It was so bizarre hearing them speak about it;
hard to believe it was real. They are extremely happy with their decision. They kept saying how it’s just
like having their old dog all over again, from the beginning. They did admit that they know there probably will be personality differences, confirming the impossibility for it to be the same exact being. So in this case,
it comes pretty close to one being having a second existence, but because it is an animal and not a complex human being, it is easier to accept it.
I just found another video of a pet owner who cloned her dog, but she claims they have no differences. Very interesting. She also said she wanted to get him cloned before he even died to see how they would have interacted together. John Locke must be screaming from his grave.
Video of couple I referred to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDUULl7HOws
I just found another video of a pet owner who cloned her dog, but she claims they have no differences. Very interesting. She also said she wanted to get him cloned before he even died to see how they would have interacted together. John Locke must be screaming from his grave.
Video of couple I referred to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDUULl7HOws
Second video I referred to:
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/pay-bring-back-clone-mans-best-friend-15338091
***UPDATE: I just watched the first episode of a TLC show about this subject called I Cloned My Pet. Very entertaining if you have the time to watch it. If not, skip to 23:00 and one of the cloned dogs has a "Dog Whisperer" come speak to the clone to ask if it is the same dog as before. Hilariously, the dog whisperer says the dog is recalling all his memories from his previous life and that the dog is in fact the same being. Haha! Basically, every one of the pet owners in this show believes that their cloned dog is their dead dog re-born.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7bw0-5ja5Q
***UPDATE: I just watched the first episode of a TLC show about this subject called I Cloned My Pet. Very entertaining if you have the time to watch it. If not, skip to 23:00 and one of the cloned dogs has a "Dog Whisperer" come speak to the clone to ask if it is the same dog as before. Hilariously, the dog whisperer says the dog is recalling all his memories from his previous life and that the dog is in fact the same being. Haha! Basically, every one of the pet owners in this show believes that their cloned dog is their dead dog re-born.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7bw0-5ja5Q
One thing that your post made me think about is that Ash isn't actually there, the opposite is. What I mean is, Ash, the human man existed, lived, and developed himself in the real world and shared that self online. The Android Ash developed himself from the virtual world, then shared himself with the real world. So in a way they are a reflection of each other, but the Android is a lot more incomplete as a thing that exists. A Xerox copy of a human, where the infinite details and complexity of a living human is reduced into a flat image or surface. Which is what I think makes it distinct from cloning. Because on a subtle, biological level there is a perfect genetic reproduction of a human, but on a physics or quantum level there are two completely different beings as soon as they exist separate of each other. So no matter what there is a split in both consciousness and physics, so no matter how you look at it, they're two different beings. Also, think about all of the philosophical implications of Shadow Clones in Naruto, from a Lockeian perspective.
ReplyDelete